Audiograbber Forums - Edit this post

To post on these forums, you must register a username. It's completely free and takes only 30 seconds to complete the form. Register Now!

Forum: Audiograbber related questions
Topic: Time to move beyond LAME?

Only forum leaders (Administrator, Moderator) or the person that posted this message may edit this message (and only registered users may edit/delete posts) Note: Only forum leaders may delete posts.
Delete? To delete this post, check this box. Disable Smilies in This Post.
Your UserName:	Want to register?
Your Password:	Forget your password?
Message to Edit: HTML is OFF UBB Code is ON Smilies Legend	Originally posted by Tomb on 02-28-2004 09:07 PM I am waiting the results of the AAC test with some interest just to see how far FAAC has come since the last one and hope we can have a real viable alternative against some of the commercial codecs. Of course other free AAC codecs include Winamp and ITunes but Itunes cannot be used on anything less than Windows 2000 while the free version of winamp restricts encoding to 2x speed and in any case I would rather have an encoder that works with AG! I will post the links to the test results when those good people at Hydrogen Audio publish them. Hans-Jurgen: Do you know what the latest binary (w32) version of FAAC is and where can I obtain it? I have 1.2.5 and got that one through a thread on Hydrogen Audio. Also on Foobar what does the Quantizer Quality on the FAAC encoder settings do? <FONT COLOR="#800080" SIZE="1" FACE="Verdana, Arial">[This message has been edited by Tomb on 28 February 2004 @ 22:21]</font>

*If HTML and/or UBB Code are enabled, this means you can use HTML and/or UBB Code in your message.